tl is a text-based load average graphing utility. Its display is similar to xload. "Why not just use tload?" For two reasons: portability and usability. tl available under a BSD-ish license.
Version | Release Date | File |
---|---|---|
14 | 9 November 2008 | tl-14.tgz (gpg signature) |
13 | 31 October 2008 | tl-13.tgz (gpg signature) |
12 | 14 April 2008 | tl-12.tgz (gpg signature) |
11 | 24 February 2008 | tl-11.tgz (gpg signature) |
10 | 24 December 2007 | tl-10.tgz (gpg signature) |
9 | 15 August 2007 | tl-9.tgz (gpg signature) |
8 | 1 May 2007 | tl-8.tgz (gpg signature) |
7 | 2 November 2006 | tl-7.tgz (gpg signature) |
6 | 24 October 2006 | tl-6.tgz (gpg signature) |
5 | 8 August 2006 | tl-5.tgz (gpg signature) |
4 | 17 November 2005 | tl-4.tgz (gpg signature) |
3 | 5 March 2005 | tl-3.tgz (gpg_signature) |
2 | 24 January 2005 | tl-2.tgz (gpg signature) |
1 | 8 December 2004 | tl-1.tgz (gpg signature) |
I have never seen tload on anything except Slackware machines. An admittedly brief attempt to compile it under OpenBSD failed gloriously. I hope that tl is more portable than tload. Actually, I'm sure it is because I've compiled it under OpenBSD, MacOS X, Debian, Solaris, FreeBSD, Slackware, and RedHat. I suspect it will work on anything that has a curses library, but who knows. If you succeed on a platform not mentioned here, please let me know. If you fail on a platform, I would also like to know.
I also have a problem with how tload performs scaling. It doesn't. One column may have a completely different scale than the one next to it. tl maintains a consistent scale on all parts of the terminal.
tl operates in one of three modes -- columnar bar graph (-c option) single-line mode (-l option) and three-line mode (default option) where each line represents, the load avgerage for the last 1, 5, and 15 minutes.
Here are some screenshots: